Well for me the confusement started with a remark of GuHa: "additionalType == typeOf" ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Oct/0136.html). Which got me to think that in case of additionalType one could write: <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/Type1 http://schema.org/Type2"> Although Stéphane's remark: "href can only include one single URI" and Martin's remark: "the type in here is a property value" do make perfect sense from an HTML perspective. Now I looked at Dan's link to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#A-href and I've also looked it up in the Microdata specifications ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-microdata-20131029/#values) and one could argue that they do indicate a single URI. All be a bit technocratic. So IMO I think it would be a good thing it schema.org could explain this a bit more 'readable'. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > This is probably going to be a FAQ question over and over and over...so.. > > We should probably annotate when something takes multiple values within > the schema somehow... hmmm.... something like... "only single value > allowed" or "doesn't support multiple values". > > Or is there already a hard and fast rule here in the schema... that only > Types can take multiple values ? > > Thoughts ? > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 01:40:21 UTC