- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:38:26 +0100
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- CC: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I replied on github with matching occurrences in schemaorg examples.txt https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/59 James also wrote some very nice examples on: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Expanded_Vocabulary He uses there as:target along as:object and as:participant. Schema.org uses schema:target for very different purpose. Possibly some of examples in my pending pull request could become even more straight forward if schema had something equivalent to as:target available! https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/15 I would find it super helpful if everyone interested in actions/activities would get familiar with *both* Schema.org and Activity Streams examples, and then we could schedule one telecon in January to discuss various possibilities for improving their alignment. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Proposal: drop instrument, participant and status Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:08:53 +0000 Resent-From: public-socialweb@w3.org Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:08:05 -0800 From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> To: public-socialweb@w3.org <public-socialweb@w3.org> https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/59 - James
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 12:38:51 UTC