- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:19:12 +0100
- To: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 1 August 2014 17:00, Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Following up on a thread which went stale back in June, Vicki and Dan @ > Google + myself formalized the prior public discussions into a pair of > alternative vocabulary re-designs. We then generated a (hopefully) > canonical set of use cases to help validate and map those alternatives. We > would like to re-start the stale discussion using this more formal proposal > in the hopes that we can drive consensus ASAP. > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/File:ProviderSellerVocabularyRe-DesignProposal.pdf > We hope to move forward with one of these solutions ASAP and look forward to > your input! Ok folks, the rough consensus here was pretty clearly towards the 'beta' option. Here's a first cut towards implementation. Github issue, https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/88 with links to these discussions, and a first cut implementation. Here's a mid-level description of the concrete changes. More abstract than the RDFS config files in Github, but more specific than the PDF overview: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SellerVendorCleanup#Changes_proposed Github branch with the changes: https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/tree/sdo-sellerbroker ... Test build: (main properties) http://sdopending.appspot.com/seller http://sdopending.appspot.com/provider http://sdopending.appspot.com/broker (superceded properties) http://sdopending.appspot.com/bookingAgent http://sdopending.appspot.com/vendor http://sdopending.appspot.com/merchant http://sdopending.appspot.com/carrier The main outstanding thing now is to check the examples match. From a quick grep-based look, we only have examples for 'seller', 'provider', 'carrier', and only the latter is obviously in need of an update. Dan
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 20:19:40 UTC