W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Buyer / Seller / Provider Re-Design

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:19:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7RY-6mck2m=dVTkK+k=yEaQUKWo+ot0TX6XXFXZJB6kA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 1 August 2014 17:00, Jason Johnson (BING) <jasjoh@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Following up on a thread which went stale back in June, Vicki and Dan @
> Google + myself formalized the prior public discussions into a pair of
> alternative vocabulary re-designs.  We then generated a (hopefully)
> canonical set of use cases to help validate and map those alternatives.  We
> would like to re-start the stale discussion using this more formal proposal
> in the hopes that we can drive consensus ASAP.
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/File:ProviderSellerVocabularyRe-DesignProposal.pdf

> We hope to move forward with one of these solutions ASAP and look forward to
> your input!

Ok folks, the rough consensus here was pretty clearly towards the
'beta' option. Here's a first cut towards implementation.

Github issue, https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/88 with links
to these discussions, and a first cut implementation.

Here's a mid-level description of the concrete changes. More abstract
than the RDFS config files in Github, but more specific than the PDF
overview: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SellerVendorCleanup#Changes_proposed

Github branch with the changes:
https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/tree/sdo-sellerbroker ...

Test build:

(main properties)

(superceded properties)

The main outstanding thing now is to check the examples match. From a
quick grep-based look, we only have examples for 'seller', 'provider',
'carrier', and only the latter is obviously in need of an update.

Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 20:19:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:34 UTC