W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2014

Re: revisiting 'position', 'episodeNumber', 'seasonNumber' modeling and Periodicals

From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:26:52 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, David Marland <david.marland@bbc.co.uk>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Richard Wallis <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140812152651.GB8241@denials.laurentian.ca>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:19:14AM -0700, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>That's putting quite a burden on the client.
>
>Big clients, such as those that can be produced by Google and Yahoo, 
>might have access to sufficient information to handle situations where 
>data routinely does not match the schema.  However, small and medium 
>clients are going to be in a much worse situation.  How are they to 
>proceed?

For my own *very small* cases, I'll be working with a handful of sites
and will adjust my client to handle the quirks of each sites
accordingly. In some ways I suspect it will be easier for the small
clients.

Dan
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 15:27:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:34 UTC