- From: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 10:55:27 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 14:55:56 UTC
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > Microdata's major selling point is simplicity. It achieves that > mostly by focusing on a single vocabulary and a tree-shaped data model. > Reverse properties break that model. It is also not clear how they could be > mapped to application/microdata+json as pointed out in another mail. > Thank you to Markus for pointing this out. I'm the creator of Microdata module for Drupal and MicrodataPHP (the most starred microdata parser written in PHP). I had been involved in the RDFa in Drupal work. I chose to develop tools for microdata instead due to its simplicity. If microdata turns into RDFa Lite-lite, then I won't have the spare cycles to maintain microdata tools. The more complexity that is added, the less maintainable the tools are for devs who don't have access to the resources of academia or the Schema.org partners. FWIW, rev caused a lot of confusion for Drupal site builders. IIRC, it was removed as a configuration option in Drupal 8. -- Lin Clark lin-clark.com twitter.com/linclark
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 14:55:56 UTC