Re: Inverse Properties in Microdata:, was Re: schema.org update, v1.8: added WebSite type; broadened isPartOf to relate CreativeWorks

>
> "Jarno is not to blame"

well, I don't feel I'm being blamed. I think we're all just doing our bests
here.


2014-08-05 15:27 GMT+02:00 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>:

> Martin,
>
> On 5 Aug 2014 at 15:09, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
> > On 05 Aug 2014, at 15:05, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm curious. Could you please elaborate a bit on this. All but the
> second
> last example
> >> in
> >>
> >>  https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/InverseProperties
> >> use identifiers and as far as I understood it, you helped creating this.
> >>
> > Jarno is not to blame, it is me. I created the examples pretty quickly
> > and thus take full responsibility for the identifiers (and the wrong use
> > of creator etc.).
>
> I'm not blaming anyone for anything. I'm trying to understand these things.
>
>
> > I will fix the latter shortly. Martin
>
> Since you are already at it: could you please ensure that each example also
> illustrates how the same data can be expressed in Microdata *without*
> reverse properties. That probably helps a lot to evaluate whether
> itemprop-reverse really results in significant simplifications.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
>