RE: Inverse Properties in Microdata:, was Re: schema.org update, v1.8: added WebSite type; broadened isPartOf to relate CreativeWorks

On 5 Aug 2014 at 14:55, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 5 August 2014 13:50, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> On 5 Aug 2014 at 14:07, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> This is exactly the thing I me that triggered my question. If it is
>> really "relatively niche and rarely used", do we really want to
>> complicate everyone's live by introducing a new feature to
>> Microdata? Or would it be more sensible to require those "few" who
>> need it to invest a little more effort?
> 
> The suggestion from Ian Hickson was that we decide what attribute we
> want, and he'll make sure it doesn't get used for anything else.
> Beyond that we can try it out and see how it goes.

:-) Well, once it's out there (and Schema.org partners start to support it), there's no way back.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 13:11:54 UTC