- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:28:53 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <534FBAF5.7000009@openlinksw.com>
On 4/17/14 5:21 AM, B.M. Allen wrote: > http://reviews..metaphorosis.com <http://reviews.metaphorosis.com> > > I have a book review blog, with one book review per blog post. I've > structured the posts to include review and book microdata, according > to Schema format and examples. The microdata works fine with Google's > testing tool. Results of actual Google searches, however, don't show > rich snippets. > > I'd appreciate any advice on what I'm doing wrong. I believe you problem might boil down to not using Schema.org terms in your Microdata based representation of book reviews [1]. If you take your Microdata (verbatim) and paste into the input fields presented by the Google Web Master tools, you should the problem i.e., I won't be able to make sense of your data. Change the names spaces of URIs for your terms, and then repeat, it will make sense of your data. Hope that helps. Links: [1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/reviews.metaphorosis.com/2014/04/touchstone-melanie-rawn.html%01reviewRating -- shows (via hyperlink that anchors text in "About:") that you have <http://reviews.metaphorosis.com/2014/04/touchstone-melanie-rawn.html#reviewRating> where (if you want Google to comprehend) it should be <http://schema.org/Review> . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 11:29:16 UTC