Re: Schema.org site updates: Added RDFa and JSON-LD incoming properties

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> First off, I'd like to join in complimenting the addition of this to
> schema.org. Great stuff!
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote:
>
>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 4 April 2014 22:05, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>> >> On 4/4/14 8:49 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The bad news is only temporary: There are a few glitches that we're
>> >>> working to fix asap.
>> >>
>> >> Dan,
>> >>
>> >> Please look at [1]. I don't know if this is a glitch or intentional.
>> >
>> > Thanks. I think you're the first person to have shown interest in the
>> > RDFa+RDFS that we used to have in per-term pages. It's on the list of
>> > things to add back in, but there are some other things that need to
>> > get done first.
>> >
>> > Note that the entire schema is available at
>> > http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html ->
>> > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html
>> >
>> > Do you have some particular use in mind for in-page schema
>> > declarations, or it's just appealing for general Linked Data usage?
>>
>> For me, I would think that each term might reference the vocabulary
>> document somehow (perhaps rel=describedBy?). It would also be useful if
>> going to http://schema.org/ would somehow allow discovery of the
>> vocabulary.
>
>
> I agree, that would be nice. I'm sure rdfs:isDefinedBy [1] is the right
> property for that. :)
>
>
>> Perhaps when you get a JSON-LD context there (through
>> content-negotiation), it could also include the JSON-LD serialization of
>> the RDFS definition? Alternatively, link to it through a suitable
>> relationship.
>>
>
> That is a good idea. I think an rdfs:seeAlso [2] link from the context
> document to a full serialization would be enough. So a nice start for <
> http://schema.org/index.jsonld> could be:
>
>     {
>       "@context": {"@vocab": "http://schema.org/"},
>       "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso": "
> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org.jsonld"
>     }
>

Or more properly:

    {
      "@context": {"@vocab": "http://schema.org/"},
      "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso": {"@id": "
http://schema.org/docs/schema_org.jsonld"}
    }

:)


> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_isdefinedby
>  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_seealso
>
>
> The Structured Data linter [1] (among other tools) makes use of the
>> RDFa+RDFS to perform basic validation services. Right now, I have to build
>> in a special case to fetch the vocabulary from
>> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html; it would be nice if that
>> could simply be discovered.
>>
>> (By the way, I've updated the linter to use the updated vocabulary. I
>> expect to update the examples used in the linter to be based on [2] (with
>> attribution). This seems like the best source for those examples; correct
>> me if I've got it wrong, though, please.
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>> [1] http://linter.structured-data.org/
>> [2] https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/blob/master/data/examples.txt
>>
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >> [1]
>> >>
>> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FVehicle
>> >> -- Note: the object of the rdfs:subClassOf relation is a literal
>> rather than
>> >> a URI
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Kingsley Idehen
>> >> Founder & CEO
>> >> OpenLink Software
>> >> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> >> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> >> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>> >> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>> >> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>