Re: Renaming http://schema.org/action to http://schema.org/muscleAction

strong +1

I think we had a similiar issue with category as a property.

Martin


On 03 Apr 2014, at 16:35, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1  Use existing /action for ActivityActions (and hurry it up too ;-)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> At schema.org we realise that we made a mistake using the property
> name '/action' for a relatively obscure medical/health concept.
> 
> In general we don't like to substantially change the meaning of a
> property after deployment. However in this case, the current usage
> seems very niche, and we would like to 'reclaim' the property name
> 'action' for use with the Schema.org Actions work (i.e.
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ActivityActions ). I am not aware of
> it being used by publishers or consumers).
> 
> If reassigning the property http://schema.org/action for use with
> Actions protocol will cause a serious problem for you, or you're aware
> of projects for whom this would be problematic, please let me know
> asap.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry
> Thad on LinkedIn

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 18:57:41 UTC