- From: Robert Kost <kostrjk@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:55:32 -0400
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Robert Kost <kostrjk@gmail.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
concede that these refinements will be necessary, though ad hoc extensions seems like the wrong way to go. On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 June 2013 17:07, Robert Kost <kostrjk@gmail.com> wrote: >> What about Person -> telephone? > > Yes, for a person, it leaves two questions for me. > 1. A person has a mobile (or two) and a land line > 2. A phone may be associated with a business, or a place? > > regards > >> >> >> On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On 04/06/13 07:13, Dave Pawson wrote: >> >> Max was looking for a refinement (phone number to 'home phone number') >> Is there any convention for doing this in schema.org? >> >> Extensions? http://schema.org/docs/extension.html >> >> Phil >> >> -- >> work: http://people.pjjk.net/phil >> twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/philbarker >> >> Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity. >> http://xkcd.com/456/ >> >> > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk >
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 13:55:58 UTC