- From: Max Froumentin <Max.Froumentin@digital.justice.gov.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:49:16 +0000
- To: "<phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>" <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- CC: "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 4 Jun 2013, at 14:49, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > On 04/06/13 07:13, Dave Pawson wrote: >> Max was looking for a refinement (phone number to 'home phone number') >> Is there any convention for doing this in schema.org? >> > Extensions? http://schema.org/docs/extension.html I have two problems with the Extensions section. 1. It says "schema.org uses the '/' character to create extensions that are specializations of existing schema.org vocabulary" Where do you use the '/' character? http://schema.org/Person/Engineer/ElectricalEngineer isn't a valid URI, nor is musicGroupMember/leadGuitar2 a valid attribute value for itemprop 2. I guess I should design an extension vocabulary for my own purposes, in particular for applications consuming my data who want to differentiate an ElectricalEngineer from a MechanicalEngineer, for instance. But if I do that, it doesn't help me with search engines who don't know about my extensions. In other words, why use the specialised Place/photo and not the general Thing/image, if search engines don't know Place/photo ? Max.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:50:45 UTC