- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:47:20 +0100
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Dan, is this just my misunderstanding please.... On 4 June 2013 18:31, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > I think we can do better than that /-based mechanism, and we should > probably get extension.html updated to suggest mechanisms like: > > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" prefix="ep: > http://example.org/2013/person-extras123#" typeof="Person > ep:ElectricalEngineer"> > <span property="name">John Smith</span> > <span property="ep:engCode" content="MATHLESS"></span> > </div> > > ...using a real schema elsewhere plus rdfa multiple typing allows > basic schema.org consumers to ignore the extension, but smarter tools > to understand that an ElectricalEngineer is a specialization of Person > (and perhaps of Engineer). I read 'specialisation' and take away a semantic of 'a subset'? An electrical engineer is a subset of all engineers? Is this different to Erics request where he wants to identify an additional property? Here is a person (or business) and they have a telephone. Are these two 'different' from schema.org perspective and from a semantic view? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 06:47:50 UTC