- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:35:25 +0100
- To: Joseph Tennis <jtennis@uw.edu>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVHevqwjEOvep+fQOgQOcbGznEPYpbQqpqUD4boT7YTc2A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Joseph In the framework of the Linked Open Vocabularies project we have started to tackle this issue and are storing on OKFN servers a backup of vocabulary versions, either explicitly declared by vocabulary publishers, or implicitly entailed from changes detected by our "LOV-Bot" which is scanning daily all stored vocabularies and compares the current on-line version with the last version in store (on a triple-by-triple basis). For schema.org we have just started and have not a long history [1], but for older vocabularies we have an interesting timeline that you might be happy to use, see e.g., [2] for the geonames ontology. The timeline is at the bottom of the page. Versions and history are stored in LOV RDF store using a FRBR representation, explained shortly at [3]. A proper paper about all this is planned with Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche in cc, we will keep you informed. Best Bernard [1] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_schema.html [2] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_gn.html [3] http://blog.hubjects.com/2012/07/frbr-in-lov-vocabulary-is-work.html 2013/1/10 Joseph Tennis <jtennis@uw.edu> > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for setting that up. I'm interested in two things here, one is > basic research and the other applied. The basic question is "how do > schemes and schemas change over time?", and I'm interested in looking at as > many examples of schemes and schemas to answer this question [1 and 2]. > The second applied question, is, how do we help designers manage change > over time? I don't think we can't provide *general* help in that regard > without asking the first question.. So the short of it, is I'm interested > in looking at how schema.org has "evolved" over time so that I can add > that versioning history to the sample of schemes and schemas. > > Again, thanks so much for setting that up! > > [1] http://joseph-t-tennis.squarespace.com/research-streams/ > [2] https://joseph-t-tennis.squarespace.com/s/VersioningOntogenyTennis.zip > > Joseph T. Tennis > Assistant Professor > The Information School > University of Washington > > Reviews Editor for the journal Knowledge Organization > > jtennis@uw.edu > http://ischool.uw.edu/people/faculty/jtennis > > On Jan 10, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > On 10 January 2013 15:24, Joseph Tennis <jtennis@uw.edu> wrote: > > Hi! > > > I was wondering if you recorded different versions or versioning info for > > schema.org? If so, where can I download different versions or this > > versioning info? Thanks! > > > It's rather entangled with the server-side implementation currently, > but I will try to make date-stamped snapshots available, at least of > versions since we have had http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html > available as an all-in-one overview. Do you have a particular use in > mind? > > Dan > > > -- *Bernard Vatant * Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant Blog : the wheel and the hub <http://blog.hubjects.com/> -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** ** * 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 16:36:20 UTC