... ah, apologies - on closer inspection it's not a top class at all, and there are indeed 'authoritative labels' with respect to an authority. I was mislead by the discussion. Barry On 09/01/2013 23:34, Barry Norton wrote: > > Isn't that an AuthoritativeThing, or an AuthorisedThing, rather than > an Authority? > > Barry > > > On 09/01/2013 23:24, Ray Denenberg wrote: >> >> Not that strange. >> >> MADS uses Authority because that's what it is, an Authority. It's >> narrower than a Concept. It is used to refer to things are >> "authoritative": authoritative form for a personal name, >> authoritative form for a place, etc. >> >> --Ray >> >> *From:*Young,Jeff (OR) [mailto:jyoung@oclc.org] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:20 PM >> *To:* Dan Brickley; Jason Douglas >> *Cc:* W3C Web Schemas Task Force; Wallis,Richard; Jamie Taylor; Guha; >> Thad Guidry >> *Subject:* RE: Should we adopt SKOS? >> >> In the MADS ontology, they used the term “Authority” in place of >> “Concept”. >> >> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/rdf/v1.html#Authority >> >> Strange but true. >> >> Jeff >> >
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:39:17 UTC