- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:28:04 +0100
- To: Robert Schroeder <bobsc@charter.net>
- Cc: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Robert Schroeder wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Per your example:
> Is http://schema.org/Product required to be nested within http://schema.org/Offer ?
No, it could also be linked via itemref (in Microdata syntax). However, since some clients process microdata as a tree, they may do not find items linked via itemref or via itemid. This is why my example nests them.
From the top of my head, I would say that itemref in microdata is safe for linking instead of nesting, while itemid in microdata and about in RDFa may not be understood by all clients.
> Are there more markup examples anywhere? Snippet Generators?
> I hope someday soon schema.org will provide some GoodRelations markup examples.
I am working on all of that ;-)
It is just a lot of work and not the only one of my duties ;-)
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 19:28:37 UTC