W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Proposal for new Schema.org mark-up: Vacation Rentals

From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:28:04 +0100
Cc: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3DB10C7D-F74A-4C2F-A22B-51140CB7A24B@ebusiness-unibw.org>
To: Robert Schroeder <bobsc@charter.net>
On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Robert Schroeder wrote:

> Martin,
> Per your example:
> Is http://schema.org/Product required to be nested within http://schema.org/Offer ?

No, it could also be linked via itemref (in Microdata syntax). However, since some clients process microdata as a tree, they may do not find items linked via itemref or via itemid. This is why my example nests them.

From the top of my head, I would say that itemref in microdata is safe for linking instead of nesting, while itemid in microdata and about in RDFa may not be understood by all clients.

> Are there more markup examples anywhere? Snippet Generators? 
> I hope someday soon schema.org will provide some GoodRelations markup examples.

I am working on all of that ;-)
It is just a lot of work and not the only one of my duties ;-)


martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 19:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:48:52 UTC