- From: Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:01:45 +0100
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Message-ID: <CAEXEg8qj0aPY1CiUJaVrPSDbY9ke01F=rNfAFA6xxAA1pGRYGA@mail.gmail.com>
Fuller information on the LII Legislative Model Project (including downloads of data and publications) is available here: http://blog.law.cornell.edu/metasausage/downloads-and-related-information/ Again, please feel free to send along comments and questions. Diane Hillmann On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com>wrote: > Folks: > > Last year I worked with a group lead by the Cornell Legal Information > Institute to build an event-aware model for US legislative materials, under > a grant from the Library of Congress. We're still in the process of > publishing the results, as well as exposing the vocabularies we built > within the Open Metadata Registry. You can get a glimpse of the former in > the blog 'Making Metasausage' (http://blog.law.cornell.edu/metasausage) > and take a look at the vocabulary portion of the work in progress ( > http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/69.html). > > We would be happy to entertain questions about the work, and will > certainly pass on links to other published material as it is issued. > > Regards, > Diane Hillmann > Metadata Management Associates > > > -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: RE: vocabularies for parliamentary proceedings >> Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:26:38 +0000 >> Resent-From: public-vocabs@w3.org >> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:26:05 +0000 >> From: Tarasova, Tatiana <T.Tarasova@uva.nl> >> To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> >> CC: Pierre Andrews <pierre.andrews@gmail.com>, eGov W3C < >> public-egov-ig@w3.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org> >> >> Hi Ghislain, >> >> Yes, I think it is a good idea to have an event-based approach to model >> parliamentary proceedings documents, as each document is indeed an output >> of an event, the Parliamentary meeting. >> >> I am considering it as a future work. For now, I am focusing on how to >> represent each document. As I already said the previous project, >> PoliticalMashup, did a great job by making implicit structure and semantics >> of the Dutch parliamentary proceedings explicit. Since I have not found any >> specific vocabulary for my needs, I will reuse already identified concepts >> and will translate them into an RDF model. >> >> Best regards, >> Tatiana >> ______________________________**__________ >> From: Ghislain Atemezing [auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr] >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:25 AM >> To: Tarasova, Tatiana >> Cc: Pierre Andrews; eGov W3C; public-vocabs@w3.org >> Subject: Re: vocabularies for parliamentary proceedings >> >> Hi, >> Just my 2cents here... >> >>> I would like to clarify better what kind of data I aim to describe in >>> RDF. I have proceedings documents which are essentially written notes >>> from the parliamentary meetings. In a nutshell, they are documented >>> speeches of members of the parliament. Since all parliamentary meetings >>> have quite strict structure, the proceedings documents implicitly >>> reflect this structure. For example, each meeting has topics (discussed >>> in the meeting); speeches are held at the meeting; the name of the >>> speaker (member of the parliament) is recorded together with her >>> affiliation; the verbal content of the speeches are held within small >>> paragraphs. There are other structural elements like scenes and stage >>> directions. All these structural elements were already extracted from >>> the proceedings by the PoliticalMashup project [2]. So, what we want to >>> do now is really "the next step": explicitly define semantics of these >>> elements and publish the Dutch proceedings as Linked Data. >>> >>> What happen if you model meetings as "Events" with the "what", "when", >> "who" views...Let say: >> -for meetings/event, you could reuse lode onto [linkedevents.org/] >> for defining different type of meetings >> -for the "what" view reusing the bibo onto has mentioned >> -for the "when" view with the time onto and any appropriate >> -The "who" view will be attached to the agent, role and organization >> -for the scenes, directions, you could reuse the buildings and room >> onto [http://vocab.deri.ie/rooms] >> >> WDYT? >> >> Other pointer of interest: >> * The project Documents onto [http://vocab.deri.ie/pdo] at DERI. >> >> I hope this also helps, >> Best >> >> Ghislain >> >> -- >> Ghislain Atemezing >> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department >> Campus SophiaTech >> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. >> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com >> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 >> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 >> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~**atemezin <http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 18:02:19 UTC