W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > February 2013

Re: vocabularies for parliamentary proceedings

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:36:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFrEyf2gX20TH7Umfu9UuygYyWO9b7Yk74WQmDCWHaU0fQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tarasova, Tatiana" <T.Tarasova@uva.nl>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 18 February 2013 16:58, Tarasova, Tatiana <T.Tarasova@uva.nl> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am looking for the existing vocabularies/ontologies (in English) that can
> be used to describe the structure of documents of parliamentary proceedings,
> i.e., written records of parliamentary meetings. For example, I am
> interested in expressing such concepts as parliamentary proceedings, topics
> (discussed agenda of the proceedings), speeches inside topics (verbal ) and
> paragraphs that constitute parliamentary speeches.
> Is anybody aware of such vocabularies? So far I have not found anything
> specific, only vocabularies that allow to describe structure of generic
> documents such as [1] or [2] .

I had a quick look and found
http://cantorva.com/2009NS/twfyl-lod-demo/vocab/ based on searching
for 'theyworkforyou' (see
http://www.mysociety.org/projects/theyworkforyou/ ) and 'rdf'. There
was also a thread ages ago on the FOAF list about describing the
Italian parliament,
For US, GovTrack might be of interest:

Hope this helps,


> [1] http://salt.semanticauthoring.org/ontologies/sdo#
> [2] http://purl.org/spar/doco/Paragraph
> Thank you,
> Tatiana
> PhD candidate at Information and Language Processing Systems group
> http://ilps.science.uva.nl
> University of Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:36:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:48:53 UTC