- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:19:20 +0000
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 3 December 2013 11:19, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote: > Dear all > > We're considering adding schema.org markup at lov.okfn.org, and in > particular in vocabulary description pages, such as > http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_schema.html. > > We can now put each vocabulary in the broad CreativeWork type, but what > about a more specific "Vocabulary" type, which could be used by any kind of > reference vocabulary : glossaries, classifications, ontologies, concept > schemes, subject headings, authorities ... > > An extra would be to have a "definedBy" property to link instances of the > oncoming Topic class to an instance of Vocabulary. > > How does that sound? Since this is for a rather limited / professional / expert audience (like SKOS), how about just using owl:Ontology ? http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#Ontology-def I believe all the other features of OWL are optional (i.e. don't feel obliged, and it would be a reasonable use of the term. Similarly http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_isdefinedby was defined for relating a term to ... where it came from. Dan
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 11:19:48 UTC