Re: Missing subClassOf?

Why does http://schema.org/Class and http://schema.org/Property exist if
the RDFa version uses rdfs:Class and rdfs:Property?


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> On 27 August 2013 22:41, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been looking at [1] and [2] and the subClassOf property
>> definition [3] is missing .
>>
>> [1] http://www.schema.org/docs/full_md.html
>> [2] http://www.schema.org/Class
>> [3] http://www.schema.org/subclassOf
>>
>
> I think we should mark [1] as an early (unsupported etc.) experiment in
> using Microdata to show schema information. The RDFa version (linked from
> http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html) is more mature and approaching
> stability. BTW each page for types, properties and enumerations also
> contains a little RDFa/RDFS description of that term too.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>  <http://www.schema.org/subclassOf>--
>> --Alex Milowski
>> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of
>> the
>> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
>> considered."
>>
>> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
>>
>
>


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics