- From: James McKinney <james@slashpoundbang.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:39:28 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
> On 5 March 2013 17:23, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com > > wrote: > > Here's a draft of a proposal for a LocalBusinessDepartment addition to > > schema.org. It is pretty small. Basic idea is that some larger 'local > > businesses' have a variety of named departments, which are worth > > describing as independent entities (e.g. opening hours etc.). > > > > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/LocalBusinessDepartment > > > > > The suggestion is for one new type, LocalBusinessDepartment, alongside > > a pair of properties (department / departmentOf) that associate a > > LocalBusinessDepartment with a LocalBusiness. For simplicity a > > LocalBusinessDepartment is also considered a LocalBusiness (thus > > inheriting all applicable properties, our primary goal). > > > > I'll try to flesh out with some full markup examples, but I hope this > > sketch is enough to get some discussion moving. > > In light of subsequent discussion, I've updated the wiki page at > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/LocalBusinessDepartment > > > The proposal is simpler now. We augment "Organization" with the > ability to point to a department, which is just another Organization > (or, implicitly, one of its more specific subtypes). We have > departmentOf as an inverse pointer. > > Also we would generalise the 'openingHoursSpecification' property > (which takes the similarly named OpeningHoursSpecification type as a > value); instead of only applying to a LocalBusiness, we allow it to > apply potentially to any Organization. > > See > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/LocalBusinessDepartment#Overview > > > This seems a pretty tiny change that brings a lot of useful > functionality. Any objections or shall we move ahead with it? > > Dan I would prefer the term "subOrganizationOf" from the ORG vocabulary [1]. Not every division of an organization is a "department". Some are divisions, or offices or bureaus, etc. subOrganizationOf is agnostic to the classification of the organization being described. "departmentOf" labels the object as a "department" which is not the intention. James 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#org:subOrganizationOf
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 06:57:49 UTC