On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote: > On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:52 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > Thanks everyone for the discussion and contributions - we made a few > > improvements and have just published the initial version of this work > > at schema.org: > > > > * http://schema.org/Action > > * http://schema.org/docs/full.html > > * Machine readable version is included in > > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html (plus a little RDFa/RDFS > > in each per-term page). > > > > As mentioned at the start of this thread > > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jul/0090.html) > > the plan is to move on from past-tense Actions to address the other > > scenarios explored in earlier drafts, i.e. the description of > > potential future actions, and mechanisms for handling them. > > I gave some feedback and asked a couple of questions back then to which I > never got any response: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jun/0044.html > > In the meantime a W3C community group [1] to advance Hydra [2] has been > set up so I'm wondering if you would be interested in collaborating on this > given on how nicely Schema.org Actions map to Hydra Operations. > hi markus! sorry, i was OOO and couldn't reply to this appropriately! hydra sounds pretty interesting! let me take a deeper dive and i'll get back to you! in the meantime, my work email address is goto@google.com, feel free to drop me a line to get something started! > > > Thanks, > Markus > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/hydra/ > [2] http://www.markus-lanthaler.com/hydra > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 18:01:57 UTC