- From: George Gooding <george@nettsentrisk.no>
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 23:39:48 +0200
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 17 August 2013 21:40:17 UTC
My proposal from January would solve this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jan/0113.html Unfortunately, the proposal was not really evaluated and the whole Comment/UserComments paradigm is still broken in schema.org. There is currently no way to mark up a multi-level comment thread with schema.org, which seems like quite a deficiency in the spec. 2013/7/29 Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> > http://schema.org/comment has the wrong range / value expected type, it > should be Comment <http://schema.org/Comment> instead of UserComments<http://schema.org/UserComments>, > which is a type of user interaction, not an actual comment. > > Also, can the schema.org/comment property be used in nested comment > threads, to link a comment to its child comment(s)? I'm assuming yes, since > Comment is a subtype of CreativeWork. > > -- > Steph.
Received on Saturday, 17 August 2013 21:40:17 UTC