Re: Proposal: Looking inside tables

Actually, an earlier version of the proposal from Omar dealt with this very
well by having the typeof='SetOf/Painting'. So, applications that are aware
of this kind of markup can do the right thing, while others don't have the
unintended consequence.

guha


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Stأ©phane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com
> wrote:

> From the proposal:
>
> <table typeof="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/">
>   <thead>
>     <tr>
>       <th property="image">Image</th>
>       <th property="name">Title</th>
>       <th property="dateCreated">Year</th>
>       <th>Technique</th>
>       <th>Dimensions</th>
>       <th property="contentLocation">Gallery</th>
>     </tr>
>   </thead>
> <tbody>...</tbody>
> </table>
>
> It should be noted that parsers which are not aware of this table
> extension would generate this information:
> <>
>    rdf:type schema:Painting;
>    schema:image "Image";
>    schema:name "Title";
>    schema:dateCreated "Year";
>    schema:contentLocation "Gallery" .
>
> How do you plane to cope with this situation? Leave it be? Would it have
> unintended consequences on some applications?
>
> Steph.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Omar Benjelloun (ط¹ظ…ط± ط¨ظ†ط¬ظ„ظˆظ†) <
> benjello@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Many useful datasets on the Web take the form of tables. The goal of this
>> proposal is to provide a simple, schema.org-friendly way to "look inside"
>> these tables, and map their contents into triples.
>>
>> This is an early draft proposal developed at Google. We're seeking
>> feedback from the community.
>>
>> The proposal is attached to this e-mail, and will be uploaded to the
>> WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals page shortly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Omar
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steph.
>