Re: Proposal: Looking inside tables

In my mind, I was sort of flipping things around...and telling a parser
that the set of attributes are my own, or borrowed from Schema.org

I was thinking along the lines of an "attribute set" being dictated by the
vocab=

So, in my example, the "category", "class", and "rowstype" attributes are
assumed from Schema.org ... where each would be assumed to mean
schema.org/category , schema.org/class , schema.org/rowstype  without
having to fully express each one.  I was thinking having the vocab= would
mean that all the attributes expressed inside the <table> tag would be
coming from whatever was on the right side of the = equals sign.

But as Dan pointed out....that is probably not a winning design.



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Stأ©phane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Quick feedback Omar and others,
>>
>> <table typeof="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/">
>>
>> I would rather see "typeof" be renamed to "rowstypeof" or simply
>> "rowstype" to truly indicate that all the rows themselves have the implied
>> type and not the Table Set type or class.  This way we can reserve the
>> Table "typeof" for higher kinded types, classes, and categories if need be ?
>>
>> My thinking and expression would look something like this :
>>
>> <table typeof="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/">
>>
>> cooler ideas also embedding the use of  http://schema.org/Class :
>>
>> <table category="OnSale" class="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab="
>> http://schema.org/">
>>
>
> In addition to what Dan said, these new attributes would also not be valid
> HTML. Sticking to existing attributes will avoid validation issues.
>
> Steph.
>
>
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Omar Benjelloun (ط¹ظ…ط± ط¨ظ†ط¬ظ„ظˆظ†) <
>> benjello@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Many useful datasets on the Web take the form of tables. The goal of this
>>> proposal is to provide a simple, schema.org-friendly way to "look inside"
>>> these tables, and map their contents into triples.
>>>
>>> This is an early draft proposal developed at Google. We're seeking
>>> feedback from the community.
>>>
>>> The proposal is attached to this e-mail, and will be uploaded to the
>>> WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals page shortly.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Omar
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Thad
>> Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry>
>> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steph.




-- 
-Thad
Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>