- From: Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:14:44 +0400
- To: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 10.04.2013, at 1:03, Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org> wrote: > I'm developing schema.org schema for points of interest (POIs), based on a lot of work on a conceptual model [1]. I've created an initial implementation using existing schema.org vocabulary -- particularly the Place object [2]. > > Two things seem to be omitted from the core schema, which are key components of our POI model. First is the idea of categorization, or freeform tagging, such as is present in the Atom category element [3]. This is a concept used in the POI model, but seems incredibly useful for any type of object, and therefore I believe category should be a property of Thing. It shouldn't be difficult to reuse http://commontag.org/Home spec for this. Their main case is RDFa, while schema.org has official RDFa representation too.
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 21:15:16 UTC