- From: Jason Ronallo <jronallo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:30:21 -0400
- To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi, I keep bookmarks of libraries, archives, and museums that use schema.org that might be useful to you. I'd love to see other LAM examples and add them as well. https://pinboard.in/u:jronallo/t:schema.org/t:example/ Jason On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > reposting under a new subject line > > >> Greetings Schema.org Taskforce >> >> Just joined this list, with a couple of things in mind >> >> 1. In general, trying to learn about schema.org developments, what's new, >> whats happening (or not :-), in particular interested at thsi moment about >> what is happening in library linked data, as I am preparing a talk I ll give >> in the summer. >> if possible pls point me to archives, repositories and >> interesting/relevant threads >> where I can learn the latest >> >> 2. >> >> I am working with a team of students in India on an exercise in web >> information collection/publishing, and we are precisely working on temple >> metadata >> >> Having found that a schema already exists, >> http://schema.org/HinduTemple >> we plan to use it, however we >> would like to extend it ( data is missing from this schema based on our >> experience) How can we contribute to refine/improve this particular schema >> on schema.org? >> >> This for me brings up the question how the schemas are pulled together in >> the first place, based on what knowledge/construct/process? >> >> (Since starting the exercise I have learned about this mailing list, so I >> may invite some students to join here if they so wish) >> >> >> cheers >> >> PDM >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> And we're back. Apologies for the hiccup! >>> >>> On 5 April 2013 01:48, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >>> > Excuse this brief note; I'll write more in a week. We've just >>> > published a revision to schema.org including substantial new >>> > vocabulary that improves >>> > >>> > The new version is numbered 1.0a indicating that this is approaching a >>> > full 1.0 release but that we still have a few additions to make before >>> > we declare we're at a full 1.0. >>> > >>> > The 1.0a additions are considered stable, but we will fix any bugs or >>> > problems that implementors encounter during this 'soft release'. >>> > Additions include the Datasets vocabulary, LRMI for >>> > education/learning, technical publishing vocabulary, more vocabulary >>> > for describing Audiences, and some supporting utility terms for >>> > describing schema.org types, properties and their inter-relationships. >>> > >>> > I won't attempt here to list everyone who contributed to these new >>> > additions (it deserves a blog post), but thanks for all your hard work >>> > and patience. There are plenty more additions still in the pipeline >>> > and I look forward to following this announcement with work towards a >>> > 1.0b update. In the meantime please share any feedback, issues etc on >>> > the WebSchemas and LRMI lists. >>> > >>> > http://schema.org/docs/full.html as always has pointers to the full >>> > vocabulary. >>> > For LRMI, http://schema.org/AlignmentObject is the main type, >>> > alongside additions to http://schema.org/CreativeWork >>> > For Datasets, we added http://schema.org/Dataset and some nearby >>> > types... >>> > >>> > Dan >>> >> >
Received on Sunday, 7 April 2013 20:31:33 UTC