- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:20:46 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
- CC: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Dan, On 28/09/2012 19:56, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> >> Summary: >> - move isPartOf from WebPage to CreativeWork > > I'd support this, and it will bring us into line with the same term > used in the Dublin Core community, > http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isPartOf > Looking at this from the bibliographic/library world I would be inclined to support this too as it would enable better support for collections, series, and multi-part works. However, CollectionPage is a bit restrictive - I was hoping that there was a generic CreativeWork/Collection to relate to. I would have thought this would also make more sense for the LMRI community. >> - add hasPart to CollectionPage > > I'm conflicted; it seems useful but I'm wary of introducing inverses > casually, and for only some of our terms. I can understand your reticence, but surely one of the prime properties of a collection is its part(s). ~Richard -- Richard Wallis Technology Evangelist OCLC
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 19:21:48 UTC