- From: Dawson, Laura <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:42:42 -0400
- To: Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org>
- CC: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "Suliman, Suraiya H" <suraiya.h.suliman@lmco.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Greg Grossmeier <greg@creativecommons.org>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, Stuart Sutton <sasutton@dublincore.net>
- Message-ID: <C9B1F705-6FFF-40CC-B081-234C2EC054FD@bowker.com>
I've been poking around, looking for library-oriented codelists for formats, but so far no luck. On Sep 21, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org<mailto:michael@editeur.org>> wrote: And here, as HTML: http://www.editeur.org/ONIX/book/codelists/current.html - relevant lists are 150, 175, 176 and 76. Yesterday I went to a workshop as part of www.linkedheritage.eu<http://www.linkedheritage.eu/> where we experimented and discussed expressing them in SKOS… This has also been covered in detail in the RDA/ONIX framework: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2007/5chair10.pdf From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com<http://gmail.com/>] Sent: 21 September 2012 16:22 To: Dawson, Laura Cc: Suliman, Suraiya H; Dan Brickley; Evain, Jean-Pierre; Public Vocabs; Greg Grossmeier; Thomas Baker; Stuart Sutton Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Proposal for an additional term: mediaType The Current ONIX codes are here: http://www.editeur.org/14/Code-Lists/#code lists<http://www.editeur.org/14/Code-Lists/#code%20lists> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Dawson, Laura <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com<mailto:Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>> wrote: Check ONIX codelists as well. Some useful stuff in those. On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:41 AM, "Suliman, Suraiya H" <suraiya.h.suliman@lmco.com<mailto:suraiya.h.suliman@lmco.com>> wrote: The list I have contains the following values. Note that this is not a complete list, just one from a particular publisher. Audio CD Audiotape Calculator CD-I CD-ROM Diskette Duplication Master DVD/ Blu-ray E-Mail Electronic Slides Field Trip Filmstrip Flash Image In-Person/Speaker Interactive Whiteboard Manipulative MBL (Microcomputer Based) Microfiche Overhead Pamphlet PDF Person-to-Person Phonograph Record Photo Podcast Printed Radio Robotics Satellite Slides Television Transparency Video Conference Videodisc Webpage Wiki ________________________________________ From: Dan Brickley [danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 8:57 AM To: Suliman, Suraiya H Cc: Evain, Jean-Pierre; Public Vocabs; Greg Grossmeier; Thomas Baker; Stuart Sutton Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Proposal for an additional term: mediaType On 21 September 2012 14:21, Suliman, Suraiya H <suraiya.h.suliman@lmco.com<mailto:suraiya.h.suliman@lmco.com>> wrote: Trying to revive this thread as those of us working on the LRMI tagger see a need to capture "mediaType" information and would like to work towards consensus on how to handle this in Schema.org<http://schema.org/>. Given that DC and EBUCore (among others) have tried to address this issue and have some proposed solutions, how can we accomodate format/medium in schema.org<http://schema.org/>? I think attributes "encoding" and "genre" ad dress things covered by DC "type". There is still a need to for things like MIMEtype, the physical medium, container format etc. Can we start with the DC "format" as the straw-man and see if this adequately covers "format" in schema.org<http://schema.org/>? Thanks for the nudge here. As previous discussion shows, various communities have all got some partial coverage of this issue, and as we consider e.g. the Library -oriented proposals from OCLC to improve our bibliographic vocabulary, the same ("content vs carrier") distinctions will re-appear. Can we separate the question of 'which schema.org<http://schema.org/> property to use' from the question of the values? What would be super-useful right now, is a list of those specific values. We'll need to split them into fields/properties of course, but for now just seeing a big collection of the values would be helpful... particularly those that occur in educational datasets. Generally with schema.org<http://schema.org/> we try to 'surface' existing content in more explicit form, rather than introduce new representations, so anything you have from the LRMI community could help guide us... cheers, Dan Laura Dawson Product Manager, Identifiers Bowker 908-219-0082<tel:908-219-0082> 917-770-6641<tel:917-770-6641> laura.dawson@bowker.com<mailto:laura.dawson@bowker.com> -- -Thad http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry Laura Dawson Product Manager, Identifiers Bowker 908-219-0082 917-770-6641 laura.dawson@bowker.com<mailto:laura.dawson@bowker.com>
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 17:43:11 UTC