Re: Comment versus UserComments

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On 8 Mar 2012, at 16:22, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote:
>
> I like text also. Sounds we're very close to agreement.
>
> Likewise x2. Unless someone can think of a showstopping reason why not,
> I'll update the wiki proposal and proceed with this design...
>

+1 for text. generic enough to capture all the variants. I wonder if other
types like Article and Review should be aligned to use that generic
property, that can be dealt with later.

I also think this new property should be of type 'text' and not Thing, as
I'm not sure Thing can just be a blurb of text.

Steph.


>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2012 5:22 AM, "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Good points.  Pointing to Thing for a text value seems inconvenient, but
>>> maybe shortening contentText to "text" (rather than "content") would be the
>>> most clear and parallel, so: CreativeWork/audio, CreativeWork/video and
>>> CreativeWork/text?
>>>
>>> -jason
>>>
>>>
>> +1 to Jason's idea.
>>
>> If you think about all the possible ways that humans can express
>> themselves or their feelings... Doing it that way would cover the 3 basic
>> forms of human expression.  But unfortunately the 4th one, "art" itself is
>> missing a high level placement under CreativeWork/ as well... where
>> Painting and Sculpture could be placed downstairs on the schema...but I
>> guess that's ok.  And the 5th one, "gestures" (which would include Sign
>> Language or simple Neanderthal hand poking) is interesting in itself if it
>> ever appeared on the web. But those would probably take the video form)  By
>> the way, Music as a human expression could be considered mapped under
>> CreativeWork/audio.
>>
>> CreativeWork/text  (I like it)
>> CreativeWork/audio
>> CreativeWork/video
>> CreativeWork/art
>> CreativeWork/gestures  (probably never needed, and not generally
>> considered a CreativeWork but a communication form.)
>>
>> --
>> -Thad
>> http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
>>
>