- From: Greg Grossmeier <greg@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:58:16 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org, LRMI TWG <lrmi-twg@googlegroups.com>, LRMI <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
<quote name="Dan Brickley" date="2012-06-27" time="21:03:53 +0200"> > > LRMI proposal contains intendedEndUserRole property with the same purpose, > > contaning some text (which is also a soft enum). > > Looking at this again ... in terms of "what can we do now for > integration, while still moving quickly towards including LRMI 1.0"? > > From LRMI, as you say, http://www.lrmi.net/the-specification > > * intendedEndUserRole schema.org/Text The individual or group for > which the work in question was produced. Ex: “student” Ex: “teacher” > > Would a minimalistic improvement here be, to allow intendedEndUserRole > to also (as an alternative) point to a thing of type > http://schema.org/Audience ? I think this might make sense, or, we could do as is suggested on the wiki page: Create a Thing->Intangible->Audience->EducationalAudience That EducationalAudience could initially have a single added term on top of what Thing provides called "educationalRole" (or similar). That educationalRole would take a text value that specifies the specific role that the group identified by EducationalAudience. That would mean that anyone who has already begun marking up content with LRMI would need to modify their markup from: <span itemprop="intendedEndUserRole">Teacher</span> to: <span itemprop="audience" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EducationalAudience"> <span itemprop="educationalRole">Teacher</span> </span> (that assumes we get rid of intendedEndUserRole in favor of the Audience intangible) If we did what you suggest ("allow intendedEndUserRole to also (as an alternative) point to a thing of type http://schema.org/Audience") what would it look like with a Audience intangible in the place of the intendedEndUserRole value? I might be misunderstanding some aspect of the syntax but it would seem it would be more nested than the example I have above? Am I missing an easy way to model that? Thanks! Greg -- Greg Grossmeier Education Technology & Policy Coordinator twitter: @g_gerg / identi.ca: @greg / skype: greg.grossmeier
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 20:59:05 UTC