- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:03:53 +0200
- To: Egor Antonov <elderos@yandex-team.ru>, Greg Grossmeier <greg@creativecommons.org>, Phil Barker <phil@pjjk.net>, Stuart Sutton <sasutton@dublincore.net>, zoe.f.rose@gmail.com
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org Vocabs" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Peter Markov <peter-markov@yandex-team.ru>
+cc Greg, Zoe, Phil, Stuart ... with whom I've variously been discussing LRMI integration On 26 June 2012 17:35, Egor Antonov <elderos@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Hi folks! > Some of our proposals (Medical/Health, TechArticle, LRMI) and also some of > our Yandex people have common ideas floating around. > I mean that currently a publisher cannot explicitly specify target audience > of his site/page/CreativeWork. > > Medical vocabulary proposal contains a type MedicalAudience, which splits > people of medicine into categories expressed as an enumeration. > > LRMI proposal contains intendedEndUserRole property with the same purpose, > contaning some text (which is also a soft enum). Looking at this again ... in terms of "what can we do now for integration, while still moving quickly towards including LRMI 1.0"? >From LRMI, as you say, http://www.lrmi.net/the-specification * intendedEndUserRole schema.org/Text The individual or group for which the work in question was produced. Ex: “student” Ex: “teacher” Would a minimalistic improvement here be, to allow intendedEndUserRole to also (as an alternative) point to a thing of type http://schema.org/Audience ? This would immediately -for example- permit use of the specific defined instances of http://schema.org/MedicalAudience we added earlier this week such as http://schema.org/Clinician ... as well as other approaches as explored in http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Audience ... While schema.org might define a few useful kinds of audience, we won't be able to anticipate every such type - hopefully various educational standards and others will get expressed this way and included via URL references. Would an 'intended end user role' of http://schema.org/Clinician even make sense in an LRMI context? Should we define similar builtins for the given examples, i.e. Student and Teacher ? Are there controlled lists out there somewhere? How does the general approach sound here, i.e. allowing intendedEndUserRole to point to an instance of http://schema.org/Audience? I'm concerned that we find a way to have a general approach to characterising audiences, but also to move ahead quickly with LRMI... cheers, Dan ps. for in-depth LRMI background, see videos in http://www.lrmi.net/metadata-lab-video
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 19:04:23 UTC