- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:24:00 -0400
- To: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnE_CKmNRV4hQN+CqdEdPAAgvMhWzcQGEgF-81PeAzsjOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Seems like we missed a couple of properties which should have been changed to their singular form. Most of the properties at the bottom of the unchanged properties of the Singularity proposal<http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity#Unchanged_.2A-s_properties> should remain plural, but 'ingredients' from Recipe <http://schema.org/Recipe>ought to be singular since 1) its definition is "An ingredient used in the recipe." and 2) the example shows a list of multiple instances of ingredients. Finally 'ingredient' (singular) is consistent with the property defined in the Google documentation for Rich snippets - Recipes<http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=173379> and used in microformats, microdata and RDFa. (I know this is not schema.org, but it will make the migration to schema.org markup easier and less error prone). 'offers' is another one that I think should be singular. It is used in CreativeWork <http://schema.org/CreativeWork>, MediaObject<http://schema.org/MediaObject> , Event <http://schema.org/Event>, and Product <http://schema.org/Product>. Maybe it was meant to be the third person, but still that does not make sense: "Event has an Offer" sounds right, but "Event offers an Offer" does not sound right. Dan, I'm happy to put this in the wiki, can I update the existing proposal even though it's marked published, or should this go into a new page? Steph.
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 15:24:39 UTC