- From: Christian Bäuerlein <christian.baeuerlein@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:46:19 +0100
- To: public-vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F08A10B.7030901@gmail.com>
Thank you for your feedback. This is another interesting use case for the pairing of demand/offers. Usually I would have started with an extension of an existing type (using the extension mechanism) but I thought this one is so basic that we can discuss the need of it right away. As far as I could see this seems to be the right place for proposals like this, so I would be happy to hear some more opinions. Best, Christian > elf Pavlik <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> > 6. Januar 2012 15:45 > > hi, > > interesting, lately i have started this community group to work on > topic of wishes/offers, their matching, dependencies and various > systems to arrange transactions (including ones not based around use > of any kind of currency) > http://www.w3.org/community/community-io/2011/09/01/embracing-diversity/ > > i guess demands/offers could come useful to use in there... > > thanks! > > ~ elf pavlik ~ > Christian Bäuerlein <mailto:christian.baeuerlein@googlemail.com> > 5. Januar 2012 23:11 > Hey everyone, > > I was wondering why there is no complement for the Offer item type. > > There are a lot of platforms out there that try to connect supplies and > demands of users (e.g. craigslist, or in my case: car pooling), but at > the moment you can only describe the offers using schema.org items. > > So I propose the introduction of an item that describes a "wanted" > thing, something a person looks for. > I created a first draft and would like to hear your feedback. Is there a > possibility to introduce this new type to schema.org? > > You can see my example here: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1523969/microdata/Demand.html > > Please note that I didn't create any special sub-types, but reused > existing ones, as I want to hear your opinions first. > > > Thanks, > > Christian >
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2012 20:14:50 UTC