- From: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:16:42 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Sean Carlos <sean@antezeta.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACho_AvO+6CAifEpSMyVBffsH4JNFwjO_YhwSgC7oXX-ZBGhXg@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, just jumping in to this conversation now. Are you using microdata? If so, you should be able to use microdata's itemref attribute<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html#attr-itemref>to handle this. The itemscope and itemtype ( schema.org/Event) for each event would be placed around the date itself. You would then place an itemref that references the single description (and any other shared properties) within each item. I don't know whether the search engines fully support advanced microdata features like itemref, but if they do then I think this is exactly the use case itemref is designed for. -Lin On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On 20 December 2011 16:20, Sean Carlos <sean@antezeta.com> wrote: > > I have several cases of repeating / recurring events, such as a > > monthly business networking lunch, where the only data elements which > > change from event to event are the dates. > > > > It appears to me that schema.org doesn't yet address this particular > use case? > > > > The current solution appears to be to repeat each event, including the > > duplication of each data element. I'm thinking of using the search > > engine frowned-upon <meta> tags to hide the repeated data in > > successive event dates. > > Thanks for raising this. It's a fair question to ask. I have some > sympathy with Martin Hepp's view, that we may be better off > materialising multiple event descriptions, rather than assuming smart > clients. Robert Kost suggested ISO-8601 however many tools use > restricted subsets of that standard, so I'm not sure that would be a > strong candidate. > > I have summarised discussion so far in our Wiki at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/RepeatingEvents and opened an issue > tracker on this at https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/11 > since whatever we conclude should be documented. > > There is also some earlier work on representing iCalendar in RDF, see > http://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfCalendarDocumentation and > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/ as well as the fairly widely adopted > hcalendar work from the Microformats community, > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar (I don't see the word 'repeat' > in that last link but I've not yet dug very deeply). > > cheers, > > Dan > > -- Lin Clark DERI, NUI Galway <http://www.deri.ie/> lin-clark.com twitter.com/linclark
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2012 05:01:44 UTC