- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 08:29:24 +0000
- To: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@yahoo.com>
- Cc: Tim van Oostrom <tim@depulz.nl>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi, Just to point out that in something like: <div itemprop="breadcrumb"> <a href="category/books.html">Books</a> > <a href="category/books-literature.html">Literature & Fiction</a> > <a href="category/books-classics">Classics</a> </div> the 'breadcrumb' property actually takes the value "Books > Literature & Fiction > Classics" (whitespace normalised for brevity). So whether or not they have <a> elements wrapped around individual words doesn't matter: a conformant microdata processor won't see them anyway. I've raised this before, but it is still not clear to me whether a. schema.org consumers only want that plain text string; b. schema.org consumers are preserving the HTML content (contrary to the microdata spec); or c. the examples are wrong and the itemprop should be on individual breadcrumb items Cheers, Jeni On 16 Dec 2011, at 23:30, Aaron Bradley wrote: > > > Thanks for weighing in, Tom. > > In this case, though, all the examples explicitly show all breadcrumb links belonging to one itemprop - what they omit is an additional, unlinked "breadcrumb" component. > > See on http://schema.org/WebPage: > > <div itemprop="breadcrumb"> > <a href="category/books.html">Books</a> > > <a href="category/books-literature.html">Literature & Fiction</a> > > <a href="category/books-classics">Classics</a> > </div> > > > By the way, the separate page identifier in the <h1> I wouldn't have a problem handling (it's not a breadcrumb) - it's the additional component on the same line. E.g. (and this is the syntax I'm leaning towards - *not* including the unlinked item in the breadcrumb declaration): > > > <div> > > <span itemprop="breadcrumb"> > <a href="category/books.html">Books</a> > > <a href="category/books-literature.html">Literature & Fiction</a> > > <a href="category/books-classics">Classics</a></span> > > Boring Classics > </div> > <h1>Boring Classics</h1> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Tim van Oostrom <tim@depulz.nl> >> To: public-vocabs@w3.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:26:37 PM >> Subject: Re: Syntax for itemprop breadcrumb >> >> Hi Aaron, >> I personally interpreted breadcrumb like: >> >> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Thing";> >> <a href="category/books.html" >> itemprop="breadcrumb">Books</a> > >> <a href="category/books-literature.html" >> itemprop="breadcrumb">Literature& Fiction</a> > >> <a href="category/books-classics" >> itemprop="breadcrumb">Classics</a> > >> Boring Classics >> <h1 itemprop="name">Boring Classics</h1> >> </div> >> >> >> 1 breadcrumb per Item/Link (semantically more obvious and less work to >> determine what is what?) >> >> You'd have a list of breadcrumb(s). This should however be an ordered list. >> >> - Tim >> >>> In breadcrumb display, the unlinked current page or section is often >> displayed in the same line as the linked parents. E.g.: >>> >>> <div><a href="/">Home</a> | About >> us</div> >>> >>> Should this unlinked portion be ("About us" in the example above) >> be included in the breadcrumb itemprop or excluded from it? 1 or 2 below? >>> >>> >>> 1 - Unlinked portion part of breadcrumb itemprop >>> >>> <div itemprop="breadcrumb"> >>> <a href="category/books.html">Books</a> > >>> <a >> href="category/books-literature.html">Literature& >> Fiction</a> > >>> <a href="category/books-classics">Classics</a> >>> >>> Boring Classics >>> </div> >>> >>> 2 - Unlinked portion not a part of breadcrumb itemprop >>> >>> <div> >>> <span itemprop="breadcrumb"> >>> <a href="category/books.html">Books</a> > >>> <a >> href="category/books-literature.html">Literature& >> Fiction</a> > >>> <a >> href="category/books-classics">Classics</a></span> >>> >>> Boring Classics >>> </div> >>> >>> None of the schema.org examples show this use case. >>> >>> See also this same question on a G+ post - feel free to comment there. >>> https://plus.google.com/106943062990152739506/posts/Bf5ZYWkVtM1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Aaron >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2011 08:29:51 UTC