- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:34:53 -0700
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: public-vision-core <public-vision-core@w3.org>
> One can also imagine to have some kind of "standard maintenance charter" > used by Groups in maintenance mode, without necessarily the need to have a team contact. Good idea! All the best, Ashok Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 08:20 -0700, ashok malhotra wrote: > >>> Would we consider recommending a simpler to be able to do option 3, >>> without doing a full AC review? >>> >> Yes, we could do that. We could also try to make the AC review less >> onerous. For example, could we get AC approval via a Web Ballot? >> > > As long as it doesn't involve recommendation work, ie actually > publishing a second edition of the document, I think it would be fine. > If it involes rec work, then the patent policy gets triggered, and it > becomes more difficult to get this done through a web ballot. > > One can also imagine to have some kind of "standard maintenance charter" > used by Groups in maintenance mode, without necessarily the need to have > a team contact. > > Philippe > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 15:36:52 UTC