- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:01:31 -0400
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-vision-core <public-vision-core@w3.org>
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 13:17 +0100, Dave Raggett wrote: > > Would anyone disagree that this is not what W3C ought to achieve? Am I > > leaving out important of Core mission? > > Universal is a little too cryptic and we may want to call out the aim to > promote accessibility and internationalization, e.g. by appending the > following words: > > including support for accessibility and internationalization. except that if we had a11y and i18n in the general description, then we would need to add security, multilingual, and privacy as well. Also, my motivation for universal wasn't to emphasize those aspects, but rather emphasize the need to address large scale use cases (and yes, I realize that "large" is vague as well :) Philippe
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 13:01:38 UTC