- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:17:28 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-vision-core <public-vision-core@w3.org>
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 21:23 -0400, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > I'd like to see if we could agree on a refinement of our Core mission at > a high level. > > We all know we're trying to bring the Web to its full potential. That's > the PR message. > > I believe that our Core mission is: > [[ > to standardize a universal open platform for data, documents and > applications on the Web that is suitable for human to machine and > machine to machine interaction. > ]] > > The universal aspect here is that our technologies are intended to be > used at a Web scale. Any use case that cannot find a justification in > the public Web, ie outside firewalls, shouldn't be classified as Core, > even though it may still be addressed for other reasons. > > By "on the Web", I do mean having the ability to dereference URIs using > the HTTP protocol, with whatever device possible (desktop, laptop, > cellphone, TVs, cameras, car embedded systems, etc.). It doesn't mean > that other protocols aren't relevant but, again, they're not part of > Core. > > Would anyone disagree that this is not what W3C ought to achieve? Am I > leaving out important of Core mission? Universal is a little too cryptic and we may want to call out the aim to promote accessibility and internationalization, e.g. by appending the following words: including support for accessibility and internationalization. -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 12:17:55 UTC