Re: Notes on the VCWG Recharering

> On 19 Nov 2025, at 11:26, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 2:32 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> To make that step the WG should agree to move on. This does not mean that the WG members agree on all details of the charter text; it only means that we agree on the general directions in there.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that we agreed to do that at W3C TPAC. We could take a
> resolution to move on at the next VCWG meeting, if that's what you
> mean?

I do not think I need an explicit and formal resolution, although it does not harm. But I need is a clear statement from the WG that I should go ahead with the administration. I do not want to give the impression of imposing anything. There is no clear statement in the minutes.

> 
> In any case, yes, we should move on. There seemed to be broad
> agreement on the current set of work items in the charter, with
> priorities set during W3C TPAC,

So… just reading the minutes it was not clear to me whether the current priorities in the charter proposal, ie, the division between 'real' work items and the tentative ones, is indeed in line with what was discussed. If not, I would need clear statements as for what I should move around.

Ivan

> certainly to the point that we could
> send an "advanced charter under development" email to the AC and then
> hopefully a vote shortly thereafter. I expect Brent and Phil will be
> in touch with you about the details. Yes, before the holidays (early
> Dec) would be good to get this done and out there for review, with
> hopefully the vote happening in January. I expect our next VCWG call
> will cover this item.
> 
> 
> -- manu
> 
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43