- From: ProSapien Sam Smith <sam@prosapien.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:15:13 +0000
- To: Brent Zundel <Brent.Zundel@gendigital.com>
- Cc: "public-vc-wg@w3.org" <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2023 08:17:05 UTC
So much for a big tent. Given that the -1s came from those companies that directly benefit from vc-jwt only and not others, it seems that any rough consensus will be impossible in the future for any variant of a big tent. Given that outcome, I can no longer support the consensus compromise we made in Miami. I withdraw my support for that compromise which was made with the full expectation that the vc-jwt was a precedent for more to come. I expect others will do the same. > On Mar 20, 2023, at 15:13, Brent Zundel <Brent.Zundel@gendigital.com> wrote: > > VCWG, > > In response to the discussion held during our 2023-04-15 meeting[1], and the proposed resolution regarding adoption of the VC-ACDC transformation specification, the chairs have determined that rough consensus to adopt the work item was not reached. > > Brent Zundel and Kristina Yasuda > VCWG Chairs > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/Meetings/Minutes/2023-03-15-vcwg#section2
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2023 08:17:05 UTC