Re: Comment Periods EXTENDED | NIST Identity Guidance

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 2:46 PM Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> wrote:
> Lots of good discussion and interest from many parties regarding feedback on making sure VCs are covered in applicable areas.

For those of you that are short on time, but want to add your voice to
something: I'm planning on authoring something from the perspective of
/some/ CCG and VCWG members with the ability to have a list of
signatures at the end of the document.

The goal with the document would be to be non-divisive and general in
the feedback (to collect the most signatures): "We think that the VC
Data Model and Issuer-Holder-Verifier model should be included in
these documents given that it is a global standard, being deployed in
pilots and production, is awesome for reasons X, Y, and Z, etc. etc.
etc." The message is intended to be positive and speak only to VCs
(not disparage or speak to other technologies in the space). The
message also will not be "this is the position of the VCWG or CCG",
but rather, "Here is a list of organizations and individuals, the
professional societies they're a part of (CCG, VCWG, DIF, ToIP, OASIS,
ISO), and a show of general support for including more about VCs in
NIST Special Publications".

Just a heads up that, given NIST personnel showed up to our meetings
and asked for our feedback as a community, we should try to provide it
to return the favor for the time they shared with us.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Friday, 17 March 2023 19:47:19 UTC