> > *It feels like we might have a nice performance improvement and crypto > agility gain, by having `JsonWebSignature2020` use JCS... but otherwise > align with the proposal from fep-390.* *+1* Butters @ Salesforce | Software Architect On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:11 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > Friends, > > I recently became aware of: > > https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-c390.md > > The proposal suggests there may be a desire to use "Data Integrity Proofs" > with "Activity Streams"... > > This would be relevant to Mastodon and other fediverse projects. > > There has been past work in this area, here are some links: > > > https://github.com/transmute-industries/RsaSignature2017/blob/master/src/__tests__/Mastodon.Integration.spec.js > > More recently these 2 items seem like they might potentially support the > request as it exists in fep-c390. > > https://github.com/w3c/vc-jws-2020 > https://github.com/decentralized-identity/JcsEd25519Signature2020 > > There are 2 technical issues that have been discussed previously which I > would like to resurface in the context of this request: > > 1. Should JsonWebSignature2020 use URDNA2015 and JCS, or just JCS?... (for > those who don't know, URDNA uses JCS under the hood for `@json` types). > 2. Should JsonWebSignature2020 use `proofValue`... with detached JWS just > like it does today? > > It feels like we might have a nice performance improvement and crypto > agility gain, by having `JsonWebSignature2020` use JCS... but otherwise > align with the proposal from fep-390. > > Regards, > > OS > > -- > *ORIE STEELE* > Chief Technical Officer > www.transmute.industries > > <https://www.transmute.industries> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2023 21:15:41 UTC