Re: VC-JWT FPWD

Kiristina,

please see:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vc-wg/2023Apr/0026.html

in short: a request for approval of the fpwd has to go to the W3M management, and that approval cannot arrive before the 21st.

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
On 16 Apr 2023 at 06:05 +0200, Kristina Yasuda <Kristina.Yasuda@microsoft.com>, wrote:
> Ivan,
> I am confused why the publication date cannot be this Thursday 20th, given there are no changes to the document needed and there is already a WG resolution?
> Thank you,
> Kristina
>
>
> From: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2023 10:21 PM
> To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> Cc: public-vc-wg@w3c.org <public-vc-wg@w3c.org>; W3C Chairs of VC WG <group-vc-wg-chairs@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: VC-JWT FPWD
>
> Inline:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> > > Orie,
> > >
> > > thanks. Two comments:
> > >
> > > 1) I am afraid Apr 20 as a publication date is not possible. Indeed, the process is as follows
> > >
> > > 1. The WG officially decides
> > >
> > This has already happened, per the resolution  https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/Meetings/Minutes/2023-03-22-vcwg#resolution3
> >
> > Regardless, I have gone ahead and made the change to the 27th as you have requested.
> > >
> > > 1. I push the copy of the document to www.w3.org/TR/2023/...
> > >
> > Your action, after the PR is merged?
> > >
> > > 1. I create an official publication request and submit it to the "Director" (using the term in the earlier incarnation of W3C, today it will have another name)
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. The "Director" (officially) approves
> > > 2. I send an official publication request to the w3c webmaster
> > > 3. The webmaster does the publication
> > >
> > >
> > > There are two time constraints in this workflow:
> > >
> > > • step (6) happens on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Personally, I prefer Thursdays because officially I am off on Mondays, and it is good if I am around if there are some last minutes' bushfires to take care of
> > > • on step (4) the "Director" (which means, these days, Philippe le Hégaret and Yves Lafon from the team) have their regular approval meetings on Fridays.
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking at the calendar this means the earliest possible publication date is the 25th, and the preferable (as far as I am concerned) is the 27th.
> > >
> > > 2) I hope that you did run the snapshot through the checker programs, namely:
> > >
> > > • https://www.w3.org/pubrules/ (Pub rules checker)
> > > • https://validator.w3.org/checklink (Link checkers)
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, see the results:
> >
> > https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/74#issuecomment-1509815598
> >
> > > Ideally, there should be no errors (warnings are fine). There are exceptions that may have to be discussed; e.g., the various references to the HTML spec may return a fragment error,  but that is due to the peculiarities of the HTML spec.
> >
> > I fixed a few of these, just to avoid the conversation.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Ivan
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Ivan Herman, W3C
> > > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > > mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43
> > > ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> > > On 15 Apr 2023 at 01:43 +0200, Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>, wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > VC-JWT Editors discussed the current state of the document and we feel it is ready for FPWD.
> > > >
> > > > I have prepared this pull request:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/74
> > > >
> > > > @Ivan Herman Is there anything else you need me to do?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > OS
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ORIE STEELE
> > > > Chief Technical Officer
> > > > www.transmute.industries
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
> --
> ORIE STEELE
> Chief Technical Officer
> www.transmute.industries
>
>