Re: Preparing for a vc-data-model v2.0 FPWD

> On 22 Jul 2022, at 21:40, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> Ivan wrote:
>> TL;DR I will have to contact Philippe for some of these questions because I
>> am unsure myself (mainly when it comes to legal/IPR issues). Luckily I have
>> a 1-1 meeting scheduled with him next week Tuesday. To speed things up, I
>> cc him on this mail.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> On 7/22/22 1:26 PM, Zundel, Brent wrote:
>> The chairs discussed this during our call today and would prefer there to
>> be separation between the v1.1 input document and the v2 working document
>> until v2 is mature enough to point to, so something like Ivan's proposal is
>> what we would like to see.
> 
> Got it.
> 
>> For VC, my personal preference would be to use
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/
> 
> Agreed. We will prepare the v2.0 FPWD publication to be released at the
> following URL:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/
> 
> Meanwhile, the following URL:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/
> 
> ...will continue to point to this static copy:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/REC-vc-data-model-20220303/
> 
> I have updated the PR to vc-data-model-2.0:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/894/commits/a91e1c5fa7bd516f5118baf4708e0eac1da2078d
> 
> -------
> 
> This begs the following questions... what about the following TR shortname
> redirections?
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-1.0/
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-1.1/
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.1/ (eventually)

We can discuss this with the webmaster. I think the best thing is to do that when we will officially publish the 2.0 and we will have to discuss with him the new short name anyway.

Ivan


> 
> -- manu
> 
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43