- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:40:34 -0400
- To: "Zundel, Brent" <brent.zundel@avast.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C VC Working Group <public-vc-wg@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Ivan wrote: > TL;DR I will have to contact Philippe for some of these questions because I > am unsure myself (mainly when it comes to legal/IPR issues). Luckily I have > a 1-1 meeting scheduled with him next week Tuesday. To speed things up, I > cc him on this mail. Ok. On 7/22/22 1:26 PM, Zundel, Brent wrote: > The chairs discussed this during our call today and would prefer there to > be separation between the v1.1 input document and the v2 working document > until v2 is mature enough to point to, so something like Ivan's proposal is > what we would like to see. Got it. > For VC, my personal preference would be to use > > https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/ Agreed. We will prepare the v2.0 FPWD publication to be released at the following URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/ Meanwhile, the following URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/ ...will continue to point to this static copy: https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/REC-vc-data-model-20220303/ I have updated the PR to vc-data-model-2.0: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/894/commits/a91e1c5fa7bd516f5118baf4708e0eac1da2078d ------- This begs the following questions... what about the following TR shortname redirections? https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-1.0/ https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-1.1/ https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.1/ (eventually) -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Friday, 22 July 2022 19:40:51 UTC