- From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:25:31 +0100
- To: public-vc-wg@w3.org
Thanks Mike the other thing I mentioned to the UK DVLA was the notion of atomic VCs. He had not heard of this concept before, but thought it was a good idea if each driving license attribute was inserted in a separate VC so that users could selectively disclose them. (I also shared ZKP VCs with him as a more advanced alternative of this). If we could get the ISO standard to acknowledge this concept as well (assuming it does not already do this), then it would be a big win for privacy. kind regards David On 16/04/2019 18:02, Mike Varley wrote: > I am not an expert on the ISO spec, but an earlier version I saw was a set of claims (like a JSON doc) that could be wrapped in another attestation format - like a VC or JWS or both. > I will try and follow up to see if that is still true. > > MV > > On 2019-04-16, 12:59 PM, "David Chadwick" <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi All > > I spoke with the UK Driving License Authority today and it appears that > an ISO standard for electronic driving licenses is nearly completed. It is > > ISO 18013 part 5 > > It is out for ballot at the moment I believe. > > Even though I am a member of BSI I cannot get a copy without being a > member of the working group (which I am not). But I understand that the > draft standard does not mention W3C Verifiable Credentials nor propose > to use our technology for electronic driving licenses. This would be a > huge missed opportunity if governments all around the world (including > the US, as I understand Virginia has piloted a system already) start to > issue electronic driving licenses that are not VC compatible. > > Is anyone in our group a member of an ISO member body and could either > get a look at the standard, or even better, suggest that W3C VCs are one > of the mechanisms to be used for publishing electronic driving licenses > to users > > Kind regards > > David > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2019 17:25:56 UTC