W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vc-edu@w3.org > November 2021

Re: Proposal: Anchored Resources and Hashlinks for VCs

From: MXS Insights <mxsinsights@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 21:43:28 +0100
Message-Id: <5A879D93-9797-4266-9AFD-C503B63438AE@gmail.com>
Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, public-vc-edu@w3.org
To: dzagidulin@gmail.com
Yes, I believe they did, but can’t find the exact notes on what they have done.

Sebastian Schmitter and Robin Klemens from GS1 Germany were talking about setting up an exploration group on this as well.

Michael Shea




> On Nov 3, 2021, at 7:14 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Ahhh yeah, I was sorry to have missed that session! Do you happen to know, does GS1 have a proposed linking property/mechanism?
> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 2:10 PM MXS Insights <mxsinsights@gmail.com <mailto:mxsinsights@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dmitri,
> 
> This sounds very interesting and very similar to some of the challenges that GS1 was raising at IIW around the current VC Standard.  Sharing a screen shot from one of the presentations.
> 
> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
> Michael Shea
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 3, 2021, at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com <mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Oliver,
>> Great question. Some thoughts on that over here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/831#issuecomment-959772827 <https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/831#issuecomment-959772827> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 6:48 AM Oliver Terbu <oliver.terbu@mesh.xyz <mailto:oliver.terbu@mesh.xyz>> wrote:
>> This sounds interesting.
>> 
>> @Dmitri Zagidulin <mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com> would it be possible to link two DIDs through one VC together with this approach?
>> 
>> Oliver
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 2:57 AM Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com <mailto:dzagidulin@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I've been hearing the subject of cryptographically binding links between VCs and other VCs (or other external resources like PDFs) come up more and more lately (it's especially been prevalent in the VC Edu community). I'd like to put forth a proposal that hopefully addresses the use case, or at very least starts a conversation. 
>> 
>> Motivation
>> 
>> Provide a mechanism with which to link multiple VCs together (as peers or as parent/child relationships).
>> Provide examples of a general purpose hashlink <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sporny-hashlink> mechanism (useful for linking VCs, but also for linking to external images, PDFs, and other files).
>> Background / Use Cases
>> 
>> There are many use cases that involve binding multiple Verifiable Credentials together. For example, a simple Student ID credential can consist of an overall container credential, which links to several individual credentials (such as a student Photo credential, a proof of enrollment at a particular university, a proof of age, etc). 
>> 
>> Note that this is different than binding multiple credentials together in a Verifiable Presentation (and having the presenter sign the VP). In the VP case, the binding just means "this presenter is authenticating the handing over of these unrelated credentials". Whereas in the linked VC case, the credentials are aware of each other, and the peer or hierarchical relationship is built into the VC itself.
>> 
>> Proposal
>> 
>> This proposal introduces two new related properties: anchoredResource and contentHash.
>> 
>> Anchored Resource
>> 
>> An anchored resource points to one or more linked or bound resources. It can appear in the credentialSubject section (which implies that the resource is linked to the subject), or in the top level credential (same level as issuer, issuanceDate, etc), which implies that the resource is linked to the credential itself.
>> 
>> Content Hash
>> 
>> A contentHash property provides a way to refer to an external resource via a Hashlink.
>> 
>> Example
>> 
>> Here's what this would look like, using a mock Student ID credential.
>> 
>> {
>>   "@context": [
>>     "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1 <https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1>",
>>     "https://w3id.org/security/suites/ed25519-2020/v1 <https://w3id.org/security/suites/ed25519-2020/v1>"
>>   ],
>> 
>>   "id": "urn:uuid:123445",
>>   "type": ["VerifiableCredential", "StudentIdCredential"],
>>   "issuer": {
>>     "id": "did:key:....",
>>     "image": {
>>        "id": "https://example-university.edu/logo.png <https://example-university.edu/logo.png>",
>>        "contentHash": "hl:<hashlink to the logo url above>"
>>     },
>>     "name": "Example University"
>>   },
>>   "issuanceDate": "2020-04-03T00:00:00.000Z",
>>   "expirationDate": "2020-12-15T00:00:00.000Z",
>>   "name": "Student Identification Document",
>>   "anchoredResource": [{
>>      "id": "urn:uuid:<URN of the related photo id credential>",
>>      "contentHash": "hl:<hashlink to the related photo id credential>"
>>    }],
>>    "proof": {
>>       // ed25519 signature proof goes here
>>    }
>> }
>> Note the two usages of contentHash in the example. In the issuer, the hashlink <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sporny-hashlink> is to a resolvable resource (a regular .png hosted somewhere), and its only purpose is to cryptographically bind the exact version of the logo. (The alternative way to do that is to embed the full image in a ... url. Except those tend to make the VC too large for some use cases, such as fitting onto a QR Code.)
>> 
>> Whereas in the anchoredResource, the hashlink is to a non-resolvable urn:uuid: type URN, which only makes sense if both the student id and the photo credential were presented to the verifier.
>> 
>> Let's continue the conversation over at https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/831 <https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/831> !
> 


Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2021 20:44:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 3 November 2021 20:44:47 UTC