W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-urispec@w3.org > October 2014

Re: resolving the URL mess

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:17:02 -0400
Message-ID: <542DF90E.1000703@intertwingly.net>
To: Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>
CC: David Sheets <sheets@alum.mit.edu>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "public-urispec@w3.org" <public-urispec@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, John Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
On 10/02/2014 09:02 PM, Austin William Wright wrote:
> Not to mention, the referenced document misuses several well-defined
> terms. I'm not sure what a "pathname" or "hash" is, it probably intends
> "path" and/or "hierpart", and "fragment".

Those names are part of the interface that browsers expose.  Examples of 
public documentation that mentions these names:



- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 3 October 2014 01:17:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:45:56 UTC