- From: Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:08:50 +0200
- To: public-unicorn@w3.org
> >Hello Nicolas, > >Your tests look interesting and thorough, but I am not sure what >precisely they are attempting to test. > >Many of them are not at all using the unicorn tool, but instead using >some other tools (feed, rdf, svg validator) which are not, as of >today, integrated with unicorn yet. > >Care to give a little more context? > >Thank you. I dont know the roadmap for unicorn, so excuse me if my comments shock it (or you). I hope the most of w3c web validator will be integrated in the future. My former message contain a draft of "test suite" for what is explain below. An idea for a web validator, could be a future version of unicorn, or a successor : During the check of an html document, the validator does not check only this one (markup, wai, embeded css etc), but also the linked document. I did give some example : rss, atom, css, rdf (all linked by <link>), svg (linked by <object>). I test if the specific valildator check the file (and the result is "checked" for the 6), and next i test if unicorn check the file if i submit only the (uri of the) embedding file (and the answer is "not checked" except for css). Next step in the road : even, coupled to a web site copier/mirrorer (like Httrack http://www.httrack.com/), capacity to check a whole web site by just clicking one command (such i can miror a whole web site with Httrack). After all, mozilla makes each night many test of compilations (http://www.mozilla.org/developer/#builds) and http://www.bortzmeyer.org/test-logiciel.html . >olivier >-- >olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 10:12:49 UTC